[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dnswl-users] Experimental dnswl.org feature - Abuse Reporting
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] | [Date Next]
- Subject: Re: [dnswl-users] Experimental dnswl.org feature - Abuse Reporting
- From: Jost Krieger <Jost.Krieger+dnswl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:27:33 +0100
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:09:18AM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote: > Over the past couple of days, we started to implement a feature to get > feedback about spam (and other forms of abuse) from dnswl.org-listed > IP addresses. > > The feature is still experimental, but we would like to get a handful > of you to test it out. It is currently a simple web form, but we plan > to add an SMTP option as soon as things have matured a bit. After a few weeks of testing, there are some results: 1. It works nicely. After I set up some work flow locally, it is not that hard to use the web interface. 2. However, if I interpret the serial numbers correctly, there aren't very many people reporting except me. Many possible reasons: a) Not many reporters. b) People only report DNSWLed spams that get through. c) People don't report from spam traps. d) People don't report backscatter. 3. Because I've got quite a number of reports, I hardly ever can see what happens, because my last 20 reports aren't usually handled (and that isn't necessary either). 4. There is a *lot* of backscatter to spam traps :-) Nothing new here. Jost -- | Helft Spam ausrotten! HTML in Mail ist unhöflich. | | Postmaster, JAPH, manchmal Wahrsager am RZ der RUB | | Bitte immer an Funktionsadressen schreiben: Postmaster@xxxxxx |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature