Re: [dnswl-users] Testing SPF on DNSWL domains

[Patrick Domack <patrickdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've always had issues just rejecting outright. Have since just let  
the spam filters just mark it as junk, unless other things override  
that setting, like valid reply to a submitted email, pinpals, ...

But in the testing time, we had so many phone calls about missing  
emails and other issues, it just wasn't worth the policy to reject it  
at that phase.


Quoting Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>:

> Hi all,
> I tested the SPF behavior and policy of the listed domains.  The
> results are displayed at http://www.tana.it/sw/spftest/
>
> I hoped to grasp who/why still does reject-on-fail, but could not
> achieve that.  The results might still be interesting to read.  I
> changed my SPF record to
>   v=spf1 +ip4:62.94.243.226 ?exists:%{ir}.list.dnswl.org -all
> after writing that.
>
> I'd be willing to repeat that test every month/year/decade, depending
> on whether there's interest about it.
>
> Comments are welcome.
> --
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Dnswl-users mailing list -- Dnswl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dnswl-users
> dnswl.org Website: http://www.dnswl.org/