[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dnswl-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Fwd: [SPAM] (6.1) Mutter und Tochter gleichzeitig gefickt und voll gespritzt!
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] | [Date Next]
- Subject: [dnswl-users] [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Fwd: [SPAM] (6.1) Mutter und Tochter gleichzeitig gefickt und voll gespritzt!
- From: Matthias Leisi <matthias@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 22:43:00 +0100
(content heavily trimmed to fool spam filters :) ) 2014-10-26 7:36 GMT+01:00 sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > [95 . 130 . 121 . 76] > Why is this spam-IP listed in the whitelist? > Most of the other IPs for this DNSWL Id (31317, email-vision.com and others) were internally blacklisted on 2014-06-23. Earlier, we added an internal note that some of the domains used are on black.uribl.com (2014-02-26). This IP (and a bunch of others) was added to the list of published IPs von 2014-10-06 10:32 (after it was added to the queue of "new" IPs found on 2014-09-25). The report here triggered a review of the recently added IPs which are now also internally blacklisted (= are not published any more). So to answer your question: Why is this spam-IP listed? -- It was a mistake. -- Matthias
[dnswl-users] [SPAM] Fwd: [SPAM] (6.1) Mutter und Tochter gleichzeitig gefickt und voll gespritzt! | "sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |