[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problems using dnswl for SPF
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] | [Date Next]
- Subject: Re: Problems using dnswl for SPF
- From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 12:55:00 +0100
s/abusing/using/ I just assume people know what they look up. If they exceed 100,000 queries they may as well subscribe, no? Ale On Mon 18/Jan/2016 03:55:47 +0100 Patrick Domack wrote: > You are abusing other peoples dns, the list.dnswl.org to do this. > > You also assume, that the other people looking up your request, don't lookup > anything else. You are assuming your the first and only one to do this. This is > a bad basis to use a service that you know limits the number of uses allowed, > and depend on it to work. > > > Quoting Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>: > >> Hi Matthias and all, >> >> SPF specs include an appendix which details how to avoid to break forwarding: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#appendix-D >> >> I'm trying D.1: >> >> v=spf1 +ip4:my.ip.add.ress ?exists:%{ir}.list.dnswl.org -all >> >> but sometimes it doesn't work well.
Re: Problems using dnswl for SPF | Patrick Domack <patrickdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |