Re: just a test

[M Champion <debacletw8@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 16/07/2022 00:12, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> hope it works, remember i had used mlmmj self long time ago, hope it 
> does not as others maillist servers break dkim and keep long debate on 
> it could not be resolved :)
Am I the only one getting a zero bit key perm fail followed by DKIM pass 
later in the auth results? All messages from this group now have at 
least one permerror.  Messages are passing though, I'm just curious and 
wonder if something my end is forewarning me of evil to come.


From Charles on the 18th at 15:27 (BST)
dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=dnswl.org header.i=@dnswl.org 
header.b="WeV6O49D";
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dnswl.org 
header.i=@dnswl.org header.b="ScfJnuZG";
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=celehner.com 
header.i=@celehner.com header.b="CYRWjVzW"; dkim-atps=neutral

From Alessandro on the 17th 11.00 (BST)
dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=dnswl.org header.i=@dnswl.org 
header.b="lsRtjq2J";
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=dnswl.org 
header.i=@dnswl.org header.b="EpUaOurz";
dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.i=@tana.it 
header.b="TVfPJ9Qn";
dkim=neutral (0-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.i=@tana.it 
header.b="BhlGeFWS"; dkim-atps=neutral


Best wishes,


Mick.