[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
[Date Prev] | [Date Next]
- Subject: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP
- From: Jan Eden <tech@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 09:01:50 +0200
Hi, I recently checked my DMARC configuration using check-auth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, and was surprised to learn that my mail server was regarded as highly trusted by Post25.com's SpamAssassin: -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [217.160.240.138 listed in list.dnswl.org] But when I checked my listing at dnswl.org, my domain/IP were not found. What's more, Posteo's spam filter never applied one of the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* to messages originating from my server, although Posteo is a dnswl.org customer. So I decided to register at dnswl.org, and after a couple of hours, Posteo did notice the new DNSWL Id, applying the actual score (RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001). So why did SpamAssassin apply the high trust symbol (or any RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* at all) before the server was even registered/listed? The self service interface hints at some inconsistency between my initial search results at dnswl.org ("not listed") and SpamAssassin's behavior, because the IP address for my DNSWL Id was First Seen on 2022-09-02 (after my registration), but Last Seen on 2022-06-09. I am confused – is there any logical explanation for this? Thanks, Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Greg Troxel <gdt@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Benny Pedersen <me@xxxxxxx> |