[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about return code .255
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: question about return code .255
- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 17:35:09 +0100
On 24.01.25 18:13, Dimitris T. wrote:
using dnswl in postscreen configuration, with local non-forwarding bind resolver :list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].0*-2 list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].1*-3 list.dnswl.org=127.[0..255].[0..255].[2..254]*-4but getting a lot of 127.0.0.255 return codes from dnswl queries... according to https://www.dnswl.org/?page_id=15#returncodes , this is a special return code in case of >100k (per 24h) issued requests..struggling with this , because all (4) MXs combined, roughly receive ~2k emails per 24h.looking at latest mail + queries logs from our resolver, and this number is never surpassed. example from "busiest" MX :➜ ~ cat /var/log/mail.log.1 | grep dnswl | wc -l 827 ➜ ~ cat /var/log/mail.log.1 | grep dnswl | grep 127.0.0.255 | wc -l 767 ➜ ~ cat /var/log/named/queries.log.1 | grep dnswl | wc -l 1929 so, could there be another reason for this?
what DNS servers do you use? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Silvester Stallone: Father of the RISC concept.
Re: question about return code .255 | "Dimitris T." <dimitris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
question about return code .255 | "Dimitris T." <dimitris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |