[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org
- From: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 21:42:33 +0100
Hello Andreas, On 14/08/2022 20:15, A. Schulze wrote:
Am 14.08.22 um 21:11 schrieb Vsevolod Stakhov:The `h=` tag still looks quite strange.Hello Vsevolod,could you be more detailed about which 'h=' and how it should look like from your point of view?Andreas
Well, my main question is what was wrong with the default headers list provided by Rspamd. It actually follows all RFC guidelines and includes oversigning where suggested. Am I missing something here?
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx> |
maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | Benny Pedersen <me@xxxxxxx> |
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx> |
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org | "A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx> |