Re: maintenance: mail.dnswl.org

["A. Schulze" <sca@xxxxxxxxx>]

Am 15.08.22 um 22:42 schrieb Vsevolod Stakhov:
> Well, my main question is what was wrong with the default headers list provided by Rspamd. It actually follows all RFC guidelines and includes oversigning where suggested. Am I missing something here?

rspamd isn't involved at all for messages handled by this list.
So 'h=' may look different then what rspamd generate.

But is something wrong/worse/missing essential?

Andreas