[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP
- From: Jan Eden <tech@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 17:32:30 +0200
On 2022-09-03 14:46, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Jan Eden skrev den 2022-09-03 09:01: > > > -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at > > https://www.dnswl.org/, high > > trust > > [217.160.240.138 listed in list.dnswl.org] > > https://multirbl.valli.org/lookup/217.160.240.138.html > > is your spamassassin have correct internal_networks, trusted_networks > settings ? > > please check it The RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI was attributed by Port25.com's SpamAssassin to a test message, and I have no insight in its configuration. After the feedback on the list, I have decided to ignore the misleading result. Thanks for the link to multirbl.valli.org, that's really helpful! - Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Jan Eden <tech@xxxxxxxx> |
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Benny Pedersen <me@xxxxxxx> |