[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies...
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies...
- From: Patrick Domack <patrickdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:21:37 -0400
(from another dnswl user) Isn't this all just reinventing the wheel?Other people setting up the same things have issues getting users to report verified spam, cause every user has a different idea of what spam is, and most users find delete to be much quicker and easier to solve the problem.
The current policy says they will monitor common maillists and rbl's and dnswl ip's that match will be delisted.
I think the current method is ok, it could probably be improved by joining with people like spamcop directly. But if your completely paranoid of a dnswl ip is sending spam on a short lived bases (till the admin of that ip corrects the problem), then maybe it would be more benifitual to run with the spamhaus/spamcop rbl's before the dnswl one. This probably won't benifit many people, unless you run a completely crazy overprotective blacklists after dnswl.
Quoting Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>:
Hi all, I recently registered at DNSWL, and am curious how it works. I found very little notices about it, e.g. when has it been founded, who pays, why it's not on wikipedia, and similar amenities... I read in http://www.dnswl.org/backgroundit is believed that abusive activities will cease upon reasonably short notice to the appropriate abuse contactI don't think DNSWL receives abuse reports in some semi-automated manner. While larger ESPs have some way to set up feedback loops, no practice is currently standardized for that, AFAIK. Not even the ARF itself. A fair practice could be for users so send abuse reports to their ESPs who, in turn, could forward them to DNSWL if the sender was registered. DNSWL could take note and forward that report to the registered sender's feedback loop contact. This could be largely automated (except for the user submitting the first report) and result, e.g., in automatically banning naughty users for a time proportional to the numbers of complaints. Just an idea. However, a Thunderbird extension for submitting ARF messages exists, IIRC. Thanks and greetings from Milan to all Ale ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Dnswl-users mailing list -- Dnswl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dnswl-users dnswl.org Website: http://www.dnswl.org/
Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies... | Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx> |
[dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies... | Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx> |