[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies...
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies...
- From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:57:08 +0200
Patrick Domack wrote:
(from another dnswl user) Isn't this all just reinventing the wheel?Other people setting up the same things have issues getting users to report verified spam, cause every user has a different idea of what spam is, and most users find delete to be much quicker and easier to solve the problem.
I think this particular wheel has never been invented properly. Possibly, people that would be good at it uses spam-free mail servers, and thus can never really check what users' reports are like. Support on clients is so sporadic that admins who want to do per user Bayesian filters on the server have to hack their own callbacks from IMAP.
The current policy says they will monitor common maillists and rbl's and dnswl ip's that match will be delisted.
That's fine, and minimizes the work.
I think the current method is ok, it could probably be improved by joining with people like spamcop directly. But if your completely paranoid of a dnswl ip is sending spam on a short lived bases (till the admin of that ip corrects the problem), then maybe it would be more benifitual to run with the spamhaus/spamcop rbl's before the dnswl one. This probably won't benifit many people, unless you run a completely crazy overprotective blacklists after dnswl.
IMHO, Spamhaus is better suited for the botnet whack-a-mole game. There is another kind of spam, bearing real sender's address, that may arise "naturally" when someone gives way to the temptation to advertise something, possibly believing it is a good thing that deserves recipients' attention. How do medium and small sized servers manage them? Without feedback, they're blind.
Quoting Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>:I found very little notices about it, e.g. when has it been founded, who pays, why it's not on wikipedia, and similar amenities...
And that? On whois I read Domain Name: DNSWL.ORG Created On: 09-Dec-2005 07: 03: 11 UTC Sponsoring Registrar: Gandi SAS (R42-LROR) Registrant Name: Matthias Leisi Registrant Organization: Matthias Leisi Registrant Street1: Ackerstrasse 150 Registrant City: Volketswil Registrant Postal Code: 8604 Registrant Country: CHI guess that's correct, however it's not very descriptive. I added the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNSWL, in case anyone wants to add to it...
Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies... | "Bernd H. Steiner" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
[dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies... | Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx> |
Re: [dnswl-users] List maintenance strategies... | Patrick Domack <patrickdk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |