[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP



Am 03.09.2022 12:30, schrieb Greg Troxel:

I would be shocked if eden.one ended up in HI without you
knowing about it by way of applying, and highly surprised if it were HI
at all. HI is things like bank servers that send alerts, very broad-brushy.

the *maximum* trust level for category 6 private/personal is MED

In general, RBLs have defenses against excessive queries, and sometimes
those end up being false results, on the theory that it's the only way
to get people to stop.  I'm not saying DNSWL has any mechanisms at all
for excessive queries

https://www.dnswl.org/?p=118

regards
Bernd

Follow-Ups:
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IPAlessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx>
References:
Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IPJan Eden <tech@xxxxxxxx>
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IPGreg Troxel <gdt@xxxxxxxxxx>