[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP
- From: "Bernd H. Steiner" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 12:42:25 +0200
Am 03.09.2022 12:30, schrieb Greg Troxel:
I would be shocked if eden.one ended up in HI without you knowing about it by way of applying, and highly surprised if it were HIat all. HI is things like bank servers that send alerts, very broad-brushy.
the *maximum* trust level for category 6 private/personal is MED
In general, RBLs have defenses against excessive queries, and sometimes those end up being false results, on the theory that it's the only way to get people to stop. I'm not saying DNSWL has any mechanisms at all for excessive queries
https://www.dnswl.org/?p=118 regards Bernd
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Alessandro Vesely <vesely@xxxxxxx> |
Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Jan Eden <tech@xxxxxxxx> |
Re: Different RCVD_IN_DNSWL rules applied to my IP | Greg Troxel <gdt@xxxxxxxxxx> |