[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Usage mistake with dnswl.org
[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Usage mistake with dnswl.org
- From: "Bernd H. Steiner" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 21:26:42 +0100
Am 19.12.2022 um 21:10 schrieb Greg Troxel:
You said "suspect" but do you have any evidence?
And "negative lookup-scores in spam-filters" can also be "unspammy" as e.g. spamassassin scores negative in sense of "good" or HAM
As I understand it, DNSWL lists IP addresses, not domains, but it only lists addresses associated with validated domains. From the query viewpoint, though, you just look up an address.
yes, queries are ip-based. See dnswl.org doc:"The query must always go to the zone “list.dnswl.org” in standard DNSBL format, ie with a reversed dotted quad IP address. To query whether the IP address “1.2.3.4” is listed, the query would thus be
4.3.2.1.list.dnswl.org" (no domain query at all)
I do know that you can't associate an IP address with a domain, if thoseIP addresses are already associated with some other domain.
correct. would also cause problems with PTR, wouldn't it?
It seems that you can associate multiple domains with a single dnswl id,
Correct too. regards bernd
Re: Usage mistake with dnswl.org | Sydney Meyer <sydney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Usage mistake with dnswl.org | Sydney Meyer <sydney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Re: Usage mistake with dnswl.org | Greg Troxel <gdt@xxxxxxxxxx> |